More free lessons this way.

Our exemplary lessons and units have been written, field-tested, and vetted by teachers and experts around the country.

Browse more lessons
Edit

The Great Serum Race: Blazing the Iditarod Trail

by Emily C. Wood and Tabatha J. Wixon

Adapted from Default Argumentation Module: Prototype Skills & Mini-Tasks by
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Overview

Description

Edit

This Language Arts module is designed for the second quarter and addresses Harcourt's Storytown Lesson 8 anthology story, "The Great Serum Race: Blazing the Iditarod Trail."  In this module, sixth grade students critically analyze the basics of the Great Serum Race of 1925 and connect that race to the current Iditarod.  The additional textual content included for reading was specifically chosen and the prompts were specifically created to encourage a meaningful investigation -- not a judgment or critique.  Learning about the students' prior knowledge with regards to sled-dog racing will give a sense of how to direct the discussions.  After multiple readings of the text, students apply their understanding of the Iditarod to analyze the pros or cons of the Iditarod. The goal in creating this module is to provide students with a small but solid foundation upon which they could seek to address their curiosity and an appreciation for common ground upon which they can build a hunger for deeper understanding.

Students write an argumentative essay of the impact of the Great Serum Race on the Iditarod.  The writing portion of this essay is designed with the expectation students have already written at least one essay in class so there is a certain expectation students already know what an essay looks like with the use of proper grammar without much scaffolding.  If this is not the case for other classrooms, additional explicit instruction in essay writing would need to be taught.

Well-written! Students needs to be possessive in sentence #4.
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Curriculum

Edit

Grade

6 - 6

Discipline

ELA

Course

6th Grade English Language Arts.

Pacing

N/A
For course, enter 6th Grade English Language Arts.
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Section 1: What Task?

Teaching Task

Edit

Task Template A4 - Argumentation

To race or not to race?  After reading The Great Serum Race,  and other selected texts, write an argumentative essay in which you argue whether we should continue the Iditarod or stop this annual tradition. Support your position with evidence from the text/s.

You're missing the word "reading" in the 2nd sentence. After reading...
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
Task is clearly articulated for students.
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Standards

Edit
Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
L.6.1
Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking.
L.6.2
Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing.
L.6.3
Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening.
L.6.4
Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade 6 reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies.
RI.6.1
Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RI.6.2
Determine a central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments.
RI.6.4
Determine the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text, including figurative, connotative, and technical meanings.
RI.6.6
Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and explain how it is conveyed in the text.
RI.6.7
Integrate information presented in different media or formats (e.g., visually, quantitatively) as well as in words to develop a coherent understanding of a topic or issue.
RI.6.9
Compare and contrast one author's presentation of events with that of another (e.g., a memoir written by and a biography on the same person).
RI.6.10
By the end of the year, read and comprehend literary nonfiction in the grades 6—8 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range.
SL.6.1
Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 6 topics, texts, and issues, building on others' ideas and expressing their own clearly.
W.6.1
Write arguments to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence.
W.6.4
Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
W.6.5
With some guidance and support from peers and adults, develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach.
W.6.8
Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources; assess the credibility of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and providing basic bibliographic information for sources.
W.6.9
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
W.6.10
Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences.
CCR.R.1
Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
CCR.R.2
Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.
CCR.R.3
Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.
CCR.R.6
Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
CCR.R.7
Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words.
CCR.R.8
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
CCR.R.9
Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
CCR.R.10
Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
RL.6.1
Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.
RL.6.2
Determine a theme or central idea of a text and how it is conveyed through particular details; provide a summary of the text distinct from personal opinions or judgments.
Show 23 more
Please add your PA Core Standards for ELA here.
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Texts

You'll need to give citations for any offline texts here in APA or MLA format. You'll want to link any additional texts you used as well.
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Rubric

Edit

Argumentation Rubric for Grade 6-12 Teaching Tasks

1
Not Yet
2
Approaches Expectations
3
Meets Expectations
4
Advanced

Focus

  • Attempts to address prompt but lacks focus or is off task.
  • D: Attempts to address additional demands but lacks focus or is off task.
  • Addresses prompt appropriately and establishes a position but focus is uneven.
  • D: Addresses additional demands superficially.
  • Addresses prompt appropriately and maintains a clear, steady focus. Provides a generally convincing position.
  • D: Addresses additional demands sufficiently.
  • Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately with a consistently strong focus and convincing position.
  • D: Addresses additional demands with thoroughness and makes a connection to claim.

Controlling Idea

  • Attempts to establish a claim, but lacks a clear purpose.
  • Establishes a claim.
  • Establishes a credible claim.
  • Establishes and maintains a substantive and credible claim or proposal.

Reading/Research (when applicable)

  • Attempts to reference reading materials to develop response, but lacks connections or relevance to the purpose of the prompt.
  • Presents information from reading materials relevant to the purpose of the prompt with minor lapses in accuracy or completeness.
  • Accurately presents details from reading materials relevant to the purpose of the prompt to develop argument or claim.
  • Accurately and effectively presents important details from reading materials to develop argument or claim.

Development

  • Attempts to provide details in response to the prompt, but lacks sufficient development or relevance to the purpose of the prompt.
  • Presents appropriate details to support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or claim, with minor lapses in the reasoning, examples, or explanations.
  • Presents appropriate and sufficient details to support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or claim.
  • Presents thorough and detailed information to effectively support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or claim.

Organization

  • Attempts to organize ideas, but lacks control of structure.
  • Uses an appropriate organizational structure for development of reasoning and logic, with minor lapses in structure and/or coherence.
  • Maintains an appropriate organizational structure to address specific requirements of the prompt. Structure reveals the reasoning and logic of the argument.
  • Maintains an organizational structure that intentionally and effectively enhances the presentation of information as required by the specific prompt. Structure enhances development of the reasoning and logic of the argument.

Conventions

  • Attempts to demonstrate standard English conventions, but lacks cohesion and control of grammar, usage, mechanics, language and tone. Sources are used without citation.
  • Demonstrates an uneven command of standard English conventions and cohesion.
  • Uses language and tone with some inaccurate, inappropriate, or uneven features. Inconsistently cites sources.
  • Demonstrates a command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Cites sources using appropriate format with only minor errors.
  • Demonstrates and maintains a well-developed command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone consistently appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Consistently cites sources using appropriate format.

Content Understanding

  • Attempts to include disciplinary content in argument, but understanding of content is weak; content is irrelevant, inappropriate, or inaccurate.
  • Briefly notes disciplinary content relevant to the prompt; shows basic or uneven understanding of content; minor errors in explanation.
  • Accurately presents disciplinary content relevant to the prompt with sufficient explanations that demonstrate understanding.
  • Integrates relevant and accurate disciplinary content with thorough explanations that demonstrate in-depth understanding.
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Background for Students

Edit

The Iditarod brings about numerous debates regarding the pros and cons of modern dog-sled racing.  Your job will be to determine whether or not the dog-sled racing event called the Iditarod has a positive or negative impact on our society.  Then, you will write an argumentative essay supporting your position.

Does the word "infamous" bias students?
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Extension

Edit

Argumentative Writing: Is dog-sledding worth it?  After reading several informational texts about modern dog-sledding, write an essay in which you conclude whether the achievement of the 1925 Great Serum Race warrants the celebration of the Iditrarod.  Support your opinion with evidence from the texts.

Informational Writing: How can we learn from dog-sledding mistakes in the past?  After reading several informational texts about dog-sledding in the past and present, write an informational essay in which you summarize how modern-day dog-sled mushers can use the experience of the past to shape future dog-sled racing.  Support your response with evidence from texts.

Narrative Writing: Re-write history!  Imagine how a dog-sled team could have done things differently.  Recreate one of the dog-sled expeditions by changing the mistakes that occurred throughout the race to model ideal dog-sledding practices.  Write a children's book depicting what the dog-sled race would have been like it the dog musher would have made better choices than he actually did.

There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Sections 2 & 3: What Skills & Instruction?

Instructional Ladder: Skills List and Mini-Tasks

Edit
No skill clusters added

Preparing for the Task

No skills defined for this skill cluster.
Bridging Conversation > Task Engagement
Ability to connect with task and and activate prior knowledge.
Iditarod Pros/Cons Video
20min
Not Provided
Task and Rubric Analysis > Task Analysis
Ability to understand and explain the task's prompt and rubric.
Task Definition and Rubric Evaluation
35min

Quick write: What is your initial reaction to the task? Write the task in your own words. After viewing the rubric, what are the important features of a good response to this prompt?

Reading Process

No skills defined for this skill cluster.
Active Reading > Essential Vocabulary
Ability to identify and master terms essential to understanding a text.
7 Robust Vocabulary Words: Frayer Model
30min

In preparation for the readings we will do about The Great Serum Race and the Iditarod, we are going to study seven new vocabulary words, first through an interactive activity and then through filling out vocabulary Frayer Model graphic organizers.

Active Reading > Note-taking
Comprehension of selected text.
Reading Comprehension Guide
1hr

Identify key ideas and details while reading selected text.

Active Reading-Note taking
1hr

You will read a variety of resources and information about Dog-Sledding. Gather information for both sides of the argument as you read. Take notes and cite sources on your t-chart.

Post-Reading > Enhancing Comprehension
Ability to identify the central point and main supporting elements of a text.
Short reflective entry for each text
10min

What are the most important ideas collected from the reading?

Post-Reading > Academic Integrity
Ability to use and credit sources appropriately.
Variety of Recorded Notes on Model Note-Taking Guide
20min

How can we avoid plagiarism by using summarizing, paraphrasing, and direct quotes to record important information from nonfiction texts?

Transition to Writing

No skills defined for this skill cluster.
Bridging Conversation > Identifying Significant Elements
Ability to begin linking reading results to writing task.
Collection of Thoughts
15min

Share with a partner your initial thoughts to the task after your reading and research. Share what you believe you will write about and why. Ask each other questions, and discuss ideas.

Writing Process

No skills defined for this skill cluster.
Planning > Planning the Writing
Ability to develop a line of thought and text structure appropriate to an argumentation task.
Outline/Organizer
45min

Create an outline based on your notes and reading in which you state your claim, sequence your points, and note your supporting evidence.

Analyze Exemplar argumentative text
15min

Students will read and analyze an exemplar argumentative text. In groups they will list and discuss key features they identified while reading the text. This text will be used as a model throughout the writing process. Students can and should refer to it at any time.

Development > Introductory Paragraph
Ability to establish a claim and consolidate information relevant to task.
Development of Introduction Paragraph
1hr 30min

How can we write an effective introduction paragraph for our argumentative essay?

Development > Body Paragraphs
Ability to construct an initial draft with an emerging line of thought and structure.
Initial Draft of Body Paragraph(s)
50min

Write an initial draft of the body paragraph(s) to include:

  • a topic sentence
  • transitional/linking words
  • supporting text-based evidence and examples
  • details/explanation
  • and closing/closure statement(s)
Closing Paragraph/Conclusion
40min

Write an initial draft of the closing paragraph that aligns/matches the opening paragraph (introduction) and brings closure to the essay.

Revision, Editing, and Completion > Revision
Ability to refine text, including line of thought, language usage, and tone as appropriate to audience and purpose.
Revision of Rough Draft
1hr 30min

How can we make changes to improve each argumentative essay's composition by organizing ideas, adding variety, and citing important evidence?

Revision, Editing, and Completion > Editing
Ability to proofread and format a piece to make it more effective.
Editing
30min

Proofread, apply editing strategies to finalize draft for readership and apply finishing touches (i.e. visuals, neatness, formatting)

Revision, Editing, and Completion > Final Draft
Ability to submit final piece that meets expectations.
Finished Piece
5min

Turn in your complete set of drafts, plus the final version of your piece.

Not Provided
I've gone through and added comments within your individual mini-tasks.
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
It looks like you have a blank mini-task at the bottom of your instructional ladder after completion. Are you able to delete it?
Kelly Galbraith on Jan 7, 2015
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Instructional Resources

Edit

Student Handouts

No handouts.
Add Attachment

Teacher Resources

No resources.
Add Attachment
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Section 4: What Results?

Student Work Samples

There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.

Teacher Reflection

Edit
Not provided
There are no comments for this section and you do not have permission to add a comment.
Jump To:
Overview
Task
Skills
Instruction
Results
View:
Teaching Task
Feedback